Comments on: Indianapolis ‘yes’; Arkansas ‘no’ on KTF

By: Caleb Powers

Caleb Powers — Fri, 01 May 2009 18:59:58 +0000

We’ll see how long that lasts, UKLutheran.

By: UKLutheran

UKLutheran — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:34:45 +0000

http://www.dioceseofsc.org/mt/archives/cat_bishop_lawrence.html

By: UKLutheran

UKLutheran — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:32:22 +0000

Dear Caleb,

I believe that Bishop Lawrence and the Diocese of South Carolina are still both in the Episcopal Church.

By: Caleb Powers

Caleb Powers — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:16:59 +0000

You don’t reckon that vote was because Fr. Lawrence was a schismatic whose real purpose in seeking election to the episcopate was to abandon the Episcopal Church and take South Carolina with him, do you?

By: Karen B.

Karen B. — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:23:10 +0000

How interesting that the diocese of Indianapolis claims to believe that a diocese should have the bishop of its choosing. They didn’t believe that in 2007, however. They voted TWICE to deny consent to Mark Lawrence, the bishop elect of South Carolina. See details at Stand Firm here: (see comment thread)

http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/22243/

By: Tertius

Tertius — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:50:56 +0000

Guthrie has to answer to a higher authority than canon law on the Day of Judgment. It’s a shame that he doesn’t recognize that Forrester is an enemy of the Gospel and shouldn’t be a rector let alone a bishop.